# Unit 3: Variability and the Normal Curve

Unit 3: Variation and the Normal Curve Review: Standard Units z-score (std units): z = ( x x ) / the number of s above averages above average (if negative, below average) Ex: Data 3, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9: x = 5.5 differences: -2.5, -2.5, -.5, .5, 1.5, 3.5 = RMS of differences 2.15 z -1.17, -1.17, -.23, .23, .70, 1.63 NOT normally distributed Ex: A list of 100 numbers, already in standard units, begins -5.8, -4.3, 6.1, .2, 10.2, -3.7. Is something wrong? They seem large -- remember, 3 away from , which is 3 in std units, is very rare Can we check? Well, = 0, = 1, so sum of their squares should be 1 = 100/100 But (-5.8)2 + (4.3)2 + (6.1)2 + ... is adding up to more than 100 fast In fact, (10.2)2 alone is more than 100 So yes, they are too big to be in std units Normal table z Area(%) z Area(%) z Area(%) z Area(%) z Area(%) 0.0 0.0 0.9 63.19 1.8 92.81 2.7

99.31 3.6 99.968 0.05 3.99 0.95 65.79 1.85 93.57 2.75 99.4 3.65 99.974 0.1 7.97 1 68.27 1.9 94.26 2.8 99.49 3.7 99.978 0.15 11.92 1.05 70.63 1.95 94.88 2.85 99.56 3.75

99.982 0.2 15.85 1.1 72.87 2 95.45 2.9 99.63 3.8 99.986 0.25 19.74 1.15 74.99 2.05 95.96 2.95 99.68 3.85 99.988 0.3 23.58 1.2 76.99 2.1 96.43 3 99.73 3.9 99.99 0.35

27.37 1.25 78.87 2.15 96.84 3.05 99.771 3.95 99.992 0.4 31.08 1.3 80.64 2.2 97.22 3.1 99.806 4 99.9937 0.45 34.73 1.35 82.3 2.25 97.56 3.15 99.837 4.05 99.9949 0.5 38.29 1.4

83.85 2.3 97.86 3.2 99.863 4.1 99.9959 0.55 41.77 1.45 85.29 2.35 98.12 3.25 99.885 4.15 99.9967 0.6 45.15 1.5 86.64 2.4 98.36 3.3 99.903 4.2 99.9973 0.65 48.43 1.55 87.89 2.45

98.57 3.35 99.919 4.25 99.9979 0.7 51.61 1.6 89.04 2.5 98.76 3.4 99.933 4.3 99.9983 0.75 54.67 1.65 90.11 2.55 98.92 3.45 99.944 4.35 99.9986 0.8 57.63 1.7 91.09 2.6 99.07 3.5

99.953 4.4 99.9989 0.85 60.47 1.75 91.99 2.65 99.2 3.55 99.961 4.45 99.9991 Normal approx: Ex 1 Weights in the population of a city follow the normal curve, with w = 140, = 30. About what % of pop weighs over 185? In std units, 185 is (185-140)/30 = 1.5. Normal table says % > 1.5 or < -1.5 is (10086.64)% = 13.36%. We only want right half: 13.36%/2 = 6.68% Much too accurate; this is only approximation: 6.7%, or even 7% Normal approx: Ex 2 Scores on a college entrance exam follow normal curve (odd!), with x = 120 and = 40. (a) About what score is the 80th %ile? (b) About what is the IQR? In normal table, we need z that gives percent in center, not 80%, but (80 - (100-80))% = 60%, which is z = .85. So 80th %ile of scores is [undoing std units] 120 + .85(40) 154 (b) We need z so that 50% of the data is between z and -z, and thats above averages z = .70. So the 3rd quartile is 120 + 40(.70), the 1st is 120 + 40(-.70), and their difference is the IQR, 2(40(.70)) = 56 Normal approx: Ex 3 Data following the normal curve has avg 80 and std dev 10. (a) What is the 15th %ile? (b) What is the 83rd %ile? (c) What % of data is between 85 and 95? (d) What % of data is between 60 and 90?

## Recently Viewed Presentations

• The Bn CPN suite of communications equipment is housed in transit cases: SIPR data interface transit case w/ TACLANE Red voice interface using Cisco IP phones LOS Di-Phase Modem Case w/KIV-19 IP Phone Case LAN/Network management resources * _C3T.* *...
• Impression - mechanical fall/mechanical back pain; PLAN - 'For ASET and Physio review a.m. Overnight analgesia' Stable overnight - required ongoing analgesia however. Thoughts? Does the mechanism and apparent injury pattern make sense? What else could have happened?
• Angle OSR (& OST) = 90. Tangent . and . radius. make a . right angle. Angle PSR = 42. Angle PMS = 42. Alternate segment theorem . with PSR. Angle MSP = 69. Base angles