Conceptualizations of Family Physician Scope of Practice in
Conceptualizations of Family Physician Scope of Practice in Ontario Sophia Kam, MA Elizabeth Wenghofer, PhD CPE Spring Meeting Winnipeg, Manitoba May 31, 2013 Problem Statement Physician scope of practice (SOP) perceived in various ways in different jurisdictions Individual family physicians vs. legislators, medical regulators and educators (Baldwin et al., 1999; Tulloh et al., 2001; Probst et al., 2002; Breon et al., 2003) Geography & variations in practice patterns
(Jin et al., 2003; Veugelers et al., 2003; Konkin et al., 2004; Hutten-Czapski et al., 2004; Chan & Shultz., 2005; Peterson et al., 2005; CIHI, 2009) Central to numerous elements of physician governance and practice (Norcini & Mazmanian, 2005, Health Force Ontario, 2006) We dont really know what SOP is (CPSO, DIALOGUE, Vol. 8 Iss.1, 2012) Assumption that SOP is entirely consistent with specialty certification (Melnick et al., 2002; CPSO, DIALOGUE, Vol. 8 Iss.1, 2012) Changes in SOP throughout careers & assessment (Baldwin et al., 1999; Tulloh et al., 2001; Probst et al., 2002; Breon et al., 2003) Hypotheses There are two hypotheses: (1) SOP is more than just education. It
includes where physicians practice medicine (i.e., it changes with the needs of their patient base, and the resources they may or may not have in their practice setting) (2) Physician SOP will change over time, and will likely narrow as physicians grow older Objectives Broad - determine how different stakeholders concerned with various areas of physician governance and practice define and conceptualize family physician SOP in Ontario Specific - determine the common
conceptual elements of SOP, where the differences lie, and the implications of these commonalities and differences Research Questions (1)How is family physician SOP defined by/in: (a) Ontario legislation? (b) medico-legal liability issues? (c) medical education?; and (d) professional regulations and licensing? (2) How do individual family physicians define their SOP? (3) What factors determine how family physicians define their SOP?
(4) How and why might these factors change? Factors Physician (Personal Provider) Age Gender # of years in medical practice Country in which medical training was received Specialty certification # of years practicing in their current setting Contd Organizational (Environmental) Type of practice
Geographic setting/location Patient base and associated needs Available resources Access to professional supports outside the primary practice setting # of hrs/week in primary practice setting # of patient visits/week in primary practice setting Active hospital/teaching appointment Focused SOP Research Rationale (1) Different practice scopes of family physicians, despite possessing common education and similar credentials (Smith & Hays, 2004;
Wong & Stewart, 2010) (2) Perspectives of SOP: medical profession vs. individual practitioners (Melnick et al., 2002) (3) Potential to redefine and reconceptualise SOP based on reassertions of factors influencing this concept in the literature (Klass, 2007) Methods, Data Collection & Procedure
Purpose: Phase I Evaluate how scope of practice is currently defined in regulatory and liability legislation (TEXTUAL ANALYSIS VIA DOCUMENT REVIEWS) PHASE I Internet search of major federal and provincial policy statements on SOP (i.e., MA, 1991; RHPA, 1991; AIT, 2012 Ch. 7, CPSO Policy # 1-08) General search of medical literature re: definitions and concepts of term SOP via medical journals, books, internet Literature search for concepts and definitions of SOP in different areas of physicians governance and practice Contd Purpose: Phase II
Examine current definitions of scope of practice in medical education, and professional governance and licensing (DISCOURSE ANALYSIS, SEMI-STRUCTURED KEY INFORMANT INTERVIEWS, FOCUS GROUPS) PHASE II Semi-structured key informant interviews & focus groups Federal and provincial medical associations (i.e., CMPA, CMA, OMA) Regulatory bodies (i.e., FMRAC, CPSO) Certification bodies (i.e., CFPC) Education bodies (i.e., AMFC) Contd Purpose: Phase III & Phase IV Assess how individual family physicians conceptualize
their own practice scopes Assess what factors influence this Assess how and why these factors might change PHASE III Survey designed 2 week pilot test of survey instrument Distributed & administered mail and online 8 weeks from initial distribution to date of reply Dillmans Tailored Design Method weeks 3 and 6 (Dillman, 2007) Contd Sample Probability sampling (oversampling northern Ontario) 4000 Ontario family physicians (CMA Masterfile, January 2012) Approx. 600 responses estimated (~15%)
Inclusion Criteria (1) Family physicians (2) Completed the 2013 CPSO Annual Membership Renewal Survey (3) Have a license to practice independently (4) In independent practice for at least 5 years (5) In good standing (6) Primary practice address is in Ontario (7) Consented to participate in this study Contd Exclusion Criteria (1) RCPSC certified specialists not holding a license to practice family medicine (2) Physicians who do not wish for their data to
be released will be preliminarily excluded from the CPSO data feed PHASE IV Post-eight week period Returned surveys examined Rural practicing participants contacted & invited to further participate in follow-up focus groups Data Analysis Plan Quantitative Data Part I Descriptive analysis re: factors physicians use themselves (e.g., Patients seen? Diseases treated? Practice structure, geographic location, etc?) SPSS Descriptive statistics re: non-parametric
items (demographic, yes/no questions). Frequencies re: most identified/popular definitions Part II Parametric testing, logistic regression re: perceptions of breadth of practice scopes (e.g. above average, about right/on par, more focused) outcome variable Study Limitations The influence of legislation and other policies and regulations that impact physician SOP will be jurisdictionally specific Specific practice contexts in areas not included in the study may differ. Results may have limited applicability for those areas
Defining the scope of a profession is difficult & defining SOP with any level of detail may be impossible (CPSO, DIALOGUE, Vol. 8 Iss.1, 2012) An attempt to define SOP may be more feasible for specialties other than family medicine (CPSO, DIALOGUE, Vol. 8 Iss.1, 2012) Regulator Considerations Re: Defining/Limiting SOP Feedback from CPSO consultation with profession includes: Potentially good for public protection Could help with resource planning Must account for different practice needs in northern and rural areas
Would such an endeavour make a difference? Concern that a consequence could be to limit SOP more narrowly (CPSO, DIALOGUE, Vol. 8 Iss.1, 2012) Unintended consequences of defining SOP too narrowly? Breadth vs. depth of knowledge expected of physicians & accountability (Melnick et al., 2002; Klass, 2007) Relevance & Implications of Expected Results This study will challenge current concepts of SOP Have direct relevance for quality of care
Baldwin et al., 1999; Tulloh et al., 2001; Probst et al., 2002; Breon et al., 2003 This study can address the lack of clarity regarding the concept of SOP Contribute to public consultations within Ontarios medical profession Numerous practical and policy implications of this research When Conducting this Research, the Following Will be Encouraged The methods encourage: Physicians to personally conceptualize SOP
(may differ from medical regulators and educators) A balanced perspective of SOP with an emphasis on physician voices The generation of a practice and evidence informed definition of SOP to be considered in legislation and medical education References Baldwin, L. M., Rosenblatt, R. A., Schneeweiss, R., Lishner, D. M., & Hart, L. G. (1999). Rural and urban physicians: Does the content of their medicare practices differ? Journal of Rural Health, 15(2): 240-251. Breon, T. A., Scott-Conner, C. E., & Tracy, R. D. (2003). Spectrum of general surgery in rural Iowa. Journal of Current Surgery, 60(1): 94-99.
Canadian Institute for Health Information. (2009). Health Indicators. Ottawa, ON: CIHI, 1-138. Canadian Medical Association. (January 2012). CMA masterfile: Number of physicians by province/territory and specialty, Canada, 2012. Ottawa: Canadian Medical Association. Retrieved from: http://www.cma.ca/multimedia/CMA/Content_Images/Inside_cma/Statistics/01Spec&Prov.pdf. Chan, B. T. & Shutlz, S. E. (2005). Supply and utilization of general practitioner and family physician services in Ontario: ICES Investigative Report. Toronto: Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences. College of Physician and Surgeons of Ontario (2012). Defining Scope of Practice: College Explores possible solution to practice drift. Dialogue, Vol. 8, Iss. 1: 9-12. Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. Second edition. New York, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Health Force Ontario. (2006). Entry to practice requirements for health care professionals outside Ontario. Retrieved from: http://www.healthforceontario.ca/Work/OutsideOntario/PhysiciansOutsideOntario/PracticeRequirements.asp x . Hutten-Czapski, P., Pitblado, R., Slade, S. (2004). Short report: Scope of family practice in rural and urban
settings. Canadian Family Physician, 50: 1548-1550. Jin, Y., Marrie, T.J., Carrier, K.C., Predy, G., Houston, C., Ness, K. & Johnson D.H. (2003). Variation in management of community-acquired pneumonia requiring admission to Alberta, Canada hospital. Epidemiol Infect., 130(1): 45-51. Klass, D. (2007). A performance-based conception of competence is changing the regulation of physicians professional behaviour. Academic Medicine, 82(6): 529-535. References Konkin, J., Howe, D. & Soles, T. L. (2004). Society of Rural Physicians of Canada, SRPC Policy Paper on Regionalization. Canadian Journal of Rural Medicine, 9(4): 257-259. Melnick, D. E., Asch, D. A., Blackmore, D. E., Klass, D. J., & Norcini, J. J. (2002). Conceptual challenges in tailoring physician performance assessment to individual practice. Medical Education, 36:931-935. Norcini, J. J., & Mazmanian, P. E. (2005). Physician migration, education, and health care. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 25(1): 4-7. Peterson, S., Shapiro, E. & Roos, N.P. (2005). Regional variation in home care use in
Manitoba. Can J Aging, 24 Suppl 1: 69-80. Probst, J. C., Moore, C. G., Baxley, E. G., & Lammie, J. J. (2002). Rural-Urban differences in visits to primary care physicians. Fam Med., 34(8): 609-615. Smith, J., & Hays, R. (2004). Is rural medicine a separate discipline? Australian Journal of Rural Health, 12: 67-72. Tulloh, B., Clifforth, S., & Miller, I. (2001). Caseload in rural general surgical practice and implications for training. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 71(4): 215-217. Veugelers, P.J., Yip, A.M. & Elliot, D.C. (2003). Geographic variation in health services use in Nova Scotia. Chronic Dis. Can. 24(4):116-123. Wong, E., & Stewart, M. (2010). Predicting the scope of practice of family physicians. Canadian Family Physician, 56: e219-e225. Thank You! Questions? I would greatly appreciate your feedback! [email protected]
Data Types in Stack ADT. When implementing stack ADT, we need to consider two important types: The type of the element stored in the stack. The type of the stack data structure itself. We must decide whether each type is...
Column names are ABOVE the column, not in the first row. If the value you enter into the first row is a number, Minitab assumes that the entire column will contain numbers (N). If the value you enter into the...
Hydrologic Abstractions Hydrologic Abstractions Interception Evaporation Transpiration Depression Detention Infiltration INTERCEPTION A portion of the rainfall is intercepted by plant foliage, buildings, and other objects. This water is not available for runoff. Interception typically removes about 0.5 mm during a...
Shrek, however, reveals he 'has layers' - which introduces to the reader that there is also an 'inner quest.' Road of Trials Shrek, with his companion Donkey, embark on the quest. Shrek now has various challenges to overcome in order...
Recap: Busses Fundamental tool for designing and building computer systems divide the problem into independent components operating against a well defined interface processor, memory, I/O compose the components efficiently Shared collection of wires command, address, data Communication path between multiple...
CASE HISTORIES - US COASTGUARD Over the past few years a number of trials have been undertaken for the US Coastguard, using both the small handheld Slugger 170 unit and the full-size unit. The USCGC Kukui undertook a full scale...
Confidence Building strategies Favourite careers question Have confidence Self confidence is the difference between feeling unstoppable and feeling scared. Your perception of yourself has a huge impact on others and how others perceive you. Perception is reality - the more...
Ready to download the document? Go ahead and hit continue!