kantian ETHICS - National High School Ethics Bowl

kantian ETHICS - National High School Ethics Bowl

ETHICS BOWL KANTIA N ETHICS STARTER QUESTION Think of as many different motivations as you can for why this person might be helping someone: Do some of the motivations make the act better than others? Good will, like a jewel, shines forth as

something that contains its whole value within itself. Immanuel Kant Do your duty though the heavens fall. Immanuel Kant WHO WAS KANT? Kant was basically a really weird guy. He was born in a tiny village in Germany called Knigsberg, and never travelled more than 10 miles outside of it during his entire life.

He had a very strict routine the story goes that local people in Knigsberg used to set their watches by the time Kant went by on this daily walk! BUT he is perhaps the most influential philosopher of the past 300 years. WHAT IS KANTIAN ETHICS? Kant argued that most things we think of as good are not always good. Intelligence, wealth etc. could always be used for evil.

For Kant, the only thing that is always good in itself is a good will. (This is a kind of drive to do the right thing, whatever it is.) We should want to act in a certain way because it is right, not because of the consequences, or for any other reason. Our job as moral agents is to work out what our duties are, and then to follow them. THREE APPROACHES TO ETHICS PERSO

N ACTION END VIRTUE ETHICS CONSEQUENTIALISM IT IS THE STATE A PERSON IS IN WHEN PERFORMING AN ACTION THAT MATTERS THE END RESULT DETERMINES THE RIGHTNESS OR WRONGNESS KANTIAN ETHICS

SOME ACTS ARE RIGHT OR WRONG IN THEMSELVES (DUTY) ACTIVITY 1. Kant thought that only good will is good in itself, whilst Bentham thought that only pleasure is good in itself. Which of these views do you find more plausible? 2. How many other things can you convincingly argue are good in themselves? 3.

How do we test for whether or not something is good in itself? THE IMPORTANCE OF UNIVERSALIZABILITY Kant believed in an objective moral law, which we can work out using reason (our capacity for thinking). All humans have the ability to reason, so we should all be able to work out the moral law. This means that, for Kant, moral laws must be universal they must be the kind of laws

that everyone could discover and follow. THE PRINCIPLE OF UNIVERSALIZABILITY Kant thought that we can tell what our duties are by seeing whether our action can be universalized. We have to ask ourselves, What if everybody did that? E.g. murder cannot be universalized if everybody murdered people who they did not like then there would be no people left! Lying cannot be universalized if everybody

lied then nobody would believe what anybody says, and lying would be pointless! THE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE Since moral laws must be universal, they cannot depend on a particular persons circumstances or their desires. Kant called these laws categorical imperatives they identify principles that we should all always follow. This is in contrast with hypothetical

imperatives principles that we should follow only if we have certain desires. ACTIVITY What are our duties? Which of these acts follow principles that could be universalized, and which depend on peoples desire for certain consequences? 1. A shopkeeper gives a customer the right change because he likes the customer. 2.

A shopkeeper gives a customer the right change because he thinks this is his duty as a shopkeeper. 3. A shopkeeper gives a customer the right change because he wants to maintain a good reputation. TREATING PEOPLE AS ENDS IN THEMSELVES Kant thought that human reason was extremely valuable. To respect other peoples reason, and their ability to discover and follow the moral law for themselves, we must never use them for our own purposes.

Kant expressed this by saying that we should never treat humanity merely as a means (to getting what we want), but always as an end in itself. AN ILLUSTRATION: THE TROLLEY PROBLEM ACTIVITY DEBATE!! Kantian ethics is a better ethical theory than consequentialism. Do you agree?

Half the group are going to argue for Kantian ethics, whilst the other half argue for consequentialism. You must take notes as the other team is arguing as you will have the chance to respond afterwards! First, lets take some time to prepare STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES: EASIER TO APPLY Kantian ethics is often easier to apply to particular cases then consequentialism.

We do not have to know all of the consequences of an action to know whether it is wrong. We just have to know what kind of action it is. Presumably we do know that, as we are thinking about doing it! This is much easier to think about when we are trying to work out what to do. STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES: ENCOURAGES AUTONOMY

Kant thought it was important for people to work out for themselves what is right and wrong, using their reason. This is better than blind reliance on authority law, parents, sacred texts etc. Kant said that we are only truly free when we choose our principles of action for ourselves. He really wants us to think about it!! STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES:

ENCOURAGES RESPECT Kants principle of treating everyone as an end in themselves encourages respect for all persons. Kant would not allow biases or prejudice to affect our moral thinking. Since we have to do our duty out of good will alone for our action to be good, we cannot allow our feelings toward people to affect our moral thinking. STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES:

PROMOTES EQUALITY The test of universalizability ensures that we cannot treat people unfairly in our moral principles. A principle like all men can vote but women cannot would not be accepted by half of the moral agents in the world!! For Kant, the human is the focal point of morality. It is our common humanity that makes us moral agents & makes us valuable. STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES: ARE

ANY ACTS REALLY ALWAYS WRONG? Kant claims that the moral laws identify actions that are always wrong, no matter what the circumstances. This is very implausible. Even his most famous examples are not very convincing: in some circumstances, breaking a promise might save hundreds of lives! Even killing someone might save more lives!

It looks like consequences do matter. STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES: TOO GENERAL & VAGUE Kantian ethics can be difficult to apply to particular cases because it is not clear which principle lies behind each particular action. E.g., is my action lying? Is it lying to make someone feel better?

Is it lying to make someone feel better because I needthe them to do something for If we describe action specifically enough, me? then we could universalize pretty much anything. STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES: COLD AND IMPERSONAL

When we are actually making moral decisions, love and compassion matter. The requirement to be motivated only by a sense of duty makes morality too cold and impersonal. If my child is drowning and I save her because I love her, how can my action be morally wrong? We should help people because we care about them, not because of a sense of duty!!

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES: WHAT IF DUTIES CONFLICT? Kantian ethics gives us no guidance as to what to do when duties conflict this seems not to have occurred to him! E.g. Promise-keeping is a duty, but what if I have promised to two different people to be in two places at the same time? What if I have promised to lie to someone? What if I three people are drowning and I only

have time to save one of them? Moral dilemmas are real there are times when we violate a duty no matter what we do.

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • Antibiotic R&D 3.0: Taking full advantage of the

    Antibiotic R&D 3.0: Taking full advantage of the

    Confusion and debate on the scientific principles1,2. We need to clarify this in public. Non-traditional agents face the same issues3. 2019-07-12 - JH Rex - FDA LPAD Public Meeting. ... Non-inferiority is a not a synonym for "worthless drug" ...
  • Philosophy 190: Plato Fall, 2014 Prof. Peter Hadreas

    Philosophy 190: Plato Fall, 2014 Prof. Peter Hadreas

    Laches' Summary Remarks about the value of training in fighting with armor 184B-C Laches: "So, as I said at the beginning, either it [fighting in armor] is an art but has little value, or it is not an art but...
  • Modernism - Pearson

    Modernism - Pearson

    Modernism Historical Context World War I- The Great War: Technology of destruction Communism—Stalin's industrialization of the Soviet Union: 20 million dead Social realism in the arts Fascism-Nationalism and racism: Hitler's institutionalization of genocide Radio and film used for propaganda Mass...
  • Brown iGEM

    Brown iGEM

    A genetic switch Genetic Regulatory Mechanisms in the Synthesis of Proteins François Jacob and Jacques Monod. Journal of Molecular Biology (1961) 3: 318-356
  • Introduction to R - University of Pittsburgh

    Introduction to R - University of Pittsburgh

    I find it useful to issue the command "source("<myfile.R>")", where <myfile.R> is replaced with the filename you want to work with. Remember, that myfile.R must be in the same folder or directory of your R, otherwise type the full directory...
  • The Study of the Bible

    The Study of the Bible

    The Nature of the Bible. Inspired by God. Every scripture is inspired by God (2 Tim 3:16; NET Bible). No prophecy of scripture ever comes about by the prophet's own imagination, for no prophecy was ever borne of human impulse;...
  • Jackie Robinson

    Jackie Robinson

    Branch Ricky was looking through the files and saw Jackie Robinson. He sent one of his agents out to see how well he played. He brought Jackie back to Branch Ricky and he signed the deal. Now he was apart...
  • 12 Simple Linear Regression and Correlation Copyright  Cengage

    12 Simple Linear Regression and Correlation Copyright Cengage

    The square of the sample correlation coefficient gives the value of the coefficient of determination that would result from fitting the simple linear regression model—in symbols, (r)2 = r . 2.Property 1 stands in marked contrast to what happens in...